Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body excels at actionable persona instructions — concrete answer templates, checkpoints, failure-mode fallbacks, and anti-fabrication validation loops are as executable as an instruction skill can be. It falls short on token efficiency and progressive disclosure: heavy padding (timeline, lineage, duplicated sections, research appendix) and a 650-line monolith that barely leverages the research bundle it ships with.
Suggestions
Move the 人物时间线, 智识谱系, and 附录：调研来源 sections into dedicated files under references/research/ and keep one-line summaries in SKILL.md, linking each clearly (e.g., '**Timeline & lineage**: See references/research/06-timeline.md') instead of the single buried appendix pointer.
Delete duplicated content: the '勤求古训，博采众方' over-layering counter-example appears in both 双层呈现分级触发 and 反模式示例, and the 何时不用此 Skill section repeats the description's 不触发 list.
Trim research-provenance padding (the 45-line source appendix and '最新动态（2026 年）' current-events rows) to a few authoritative citations; keep only what changes how Claude answers.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with genuinely non-obvious domain content (textual evidence per mental model, 判断语气三档 with certainty percentages, 表达 DNA rules), so it is not 'noticeably verbose' in the anchor-2 sense — but it could clearly be tightened: the 17-row timeline including 2026 current-events rows, the 智识谱系 lineage lists, the 45-line research-source appendix, and verbatim duplicated content (the '勤求古训，博采众方' counter-example appears twice, and the 不触发 scenarios repeat the description) all pad the token budget. Anchor 3: mostly efficient but several sections are trimmable. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully executable for an instruction-only skill: exact answer templates ('先给证候判断…再引条文…后出方剂…不忘禁忌'), verbatim disclaimers ('吾非执业医，所言方药为古方示例…'), ❌/✅ anti-pattern pairs for every failure mode, a six-channel diagnostic decision tree, and a mandated research tool ('mcp__MiniMax__web_search'). Claude knows exactly what to do in each scenario — anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 3-step agentic protocol is clearly sequenced (question classification table → four tabulated research dimensions → templated answer), with explicit checkpoints (CHECKPOINT 1 blocks prescribing until ≥3 of 四诊 elements are confirmed), F1–F5 failure modes each with trigger and fallback, a 三问法则 self-validation loop against fabricated citations, and a three-tier exit mechanism. This matches the anchor-5 standard of explicit validation steps and feedback loops. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A bundle exists (references/research/, 6 files, 4,351 lines — verified real) but the body points to it exactly once, buried in a closing appendix ('调研过程详见 references/research/ 目录'), while ~650 lines of content (timeline, intellectual lineage, mental-model evidence, research sources) are inlined in SKILL.md where much of it belongs in the already-existing reference files. Section headers are good, so above anchor 2's 'minimal structure'; but references are not clearly signaled and inline content that should be separate — anchor 3. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |