Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplary lean, fully executable workflow: concrete commands, explicit conflict-handling and verification checkpoints, and clean section organization with no padding. No bundle files are present and none are needed at this size.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | ~60 lean lines with zero concept explanations: every line instructs (commands, paths, conflict handling). The one illustrative sentence ("gh pr checkout handles fetching, fork tracking, and branch setup automatically") earns its place by preventing redundant manual steps. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands throughout: `mkdir -p <repo-root>/.worktrees`, `git worktree add .worktrees/<name> --detach`, `gh pr view <number> --json headRefName -q .headRefName`, `git checkout --no-track -b <new-branch>`, and concrete edge-case handling (existing worktree, branch already checked out elsewhere). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 4-step workflow with explicit checkpoints: branch-conflict detection (check `git worktree list` output, then `AskUserQuestion` with a defined stop condition) and a `pwd` verification step that halts on failure. Worktree creation is not a destructive or batch operation, so no validation cap applies. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist (references/, scripts/, assets/ are absent) and none are needed: the skill is short and self-contained with well-organized sections (Steps 1-4). Per the rubric's simple-skill guidance, well-organized sections suffice when no external references are required. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 20 / 20 Passed |