Maintain and follow up on a single Docker documentation pull request that you own or are responsible for updating. Check CI and review feedback, fix actionable failures, push changes, reply to comments, and report status. Use for requests such as "babysit this PR", "check the status of my PR", "fix CI on my PR", or "address review comments on #500". Do not use for maintainer review of an incoming contribution; use review-pr for that.
70
85%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Do one maintenance pass over the specified author-owned PR: inspect its state, fix actionable failures or feedback, reply to reviewers, and report the result. This workflow may modify the branch and GitHub because the user is asking to maintain the PR. Do not apply it to an incoming PR merely because the user asks to review or assess it.
gh pr view <PR> --repo docker/docs --json state,title,url,headRefName,headRepositoryOwner,comments,reviews,reviewDecision
gh pr checks <PR> --repo docker/docs --json name,state,detailsUrl
gh api repos/docker/docs/pulls/<PR>/comments \
--jq '[.[] | {id, author: .user.login, body, path, line, in_reply_to_id}]'Always check both top-level reviews and inline comments. A review with an
empty body may still contain line-level feedback. Confirm that the PR is one
the user owns or is authorized to update before checking out or pushing its
branch. If not, stop and use review-pr.
If merged, report the final state and identify unanswered review comments. Reply only when the user remains responsible for follow-up.
If closed without merge, read the closing context and report the reason. Common causes include maintainer rejection, supersession, or automation.
Follow repository instructions for formatting, targeted linting, explicit staging, commits, and pushes. Preserve unrelated working-tree changes.
Treat every review comment as a claim to verify. Implement it only when the evidence supports it; explain any evidence-based disagreement.
After each fix:
Generated by Codex.Use the inline comment endpoint to reply:
gh api repos/docker/docs/pulls/<PR>/comments \
--method POST \
--field in_reply_to=<COMMENT_ID> \
--field body='<RESPONSE>'Use GraphQL to retrieve unresolved review-thread IDs and resolve only the threads that were addressed. Do not silently fix feedback without replying.
## PR #<number>: <title>
**State:** <open, merged, or closed>
**CI:** <passing, failing, or pending>
**Review:** <approved, changes requested, or pending>
**Action taken:** <changes, replies, and thread resolution, or none needed>4d3cbcd
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.