Content
68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a concise, actionable, well-structured verification procedure, but it is missing an explicit re-validation feedback loop after the batch fix step.
Suggestions
Add a re-verification checkpoint after Step 4: re-run the Step 3 comparison to confirm every fix now matches Roslyn before presenting results.
Include a concrete search command (e.g. a grep/rg snippet for ErrorCode.cs) to make the lookup fully copy-paste executable.
Add a brief 'Stop conditions' note for when See also targets are missing from the branch so the fix step is unambiguous.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean procedural guidance that assumes Claude's competence — no padding about what C# or Roslyn is — with code/XML examples that earn their place; only minor tightening opportunities. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides exact file paths (ErrorCode.cs, CSharpResources.resx), a precise lookup procedure, and a concrete report-table format, though it stops short of giving literal search commands. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1–6 are clearly sequenced, but the batch 'Fix All Mismatches' step lacks an explicit re-verification checkpoint after corrections, so the validation gap caps this per the batch-operation rule. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single self-contained file with well-organized sections (Required Input, Key Paths, Steps 1–6) and no nested references; structure is good with only minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |