CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

query-pipeline

Implementation details for EF Core LINQ query translation, SQL generation, and bulk operations (ExecuteUpdate/ExecuteDelete). Use when changing expression visitors, SqlExpressions, QuerySqlGenerator, ShaperProcessingExpressionVisitor, UpdateExpression, DeleteExpression, or related classes.

67

Quality

80%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.agents/skills/query-pipeline/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is exceptionally concise and well-structured for a simple skill, but it stays at the level of named APIs and stage labels rather than executable guidance, and lacks validation feedback loops that the destructive/bulk operations warrant.

Suggestions

Add a short executable example or command per stage (e.g., a snippet showing how to invoke ExpressionPrinter at the Translation stage) to lift actionability above bare API names.

Wire validation into the sequence as explicit checkpoints (e.g., after Translation, run ToQueryString()/ExpressionPrinter before proceeding) and add a validate-fix-retry loop for ExecuteUpdate/ExecuteDelete batch operations.

Trim the final validation bullet to remove the redundant clause about the generated SQL corresponding to the base-method LINQ query.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

A lean ~15-line body that assumes Claude's knowledge of EF Core, with no padded explanations; only the final validation bullet is slightly long-winded, not enough to drop below 5.

5 / 5

Actionability

Names concrete, usable APIs (ToQueryString(), ExpressionPrinter, AssertSql()) but provides no executable code or commands, and the pipeline stages are bare labels with no instruction on what to do at each step.

3 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear numbered stage sequence and a validation section exist, but validation is not wired into the stages as checkpoints and there is no validate-fix-retry feedback loop; the skill's destructive/batch operations cap this at 3.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Under 50 lines with no bundle files and no need for external references, the body is cleanly organized into well-signaled Stages and Validation sections, satisfying the simple-skill exception for a 5.

5 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A precise, well-structured description that clearly answers both what the skill covers and when to use it, anchored in concrete EF Core pipeline types and operations. Minor room for broader natural-language synonyms, but conflict risk and completeness are strong.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain and several concrete actions (LINQ query translation, SQL generation, ExecuteUpdate/ExecuteDelete) plus specific class names, sitting above the 3 anchor with minor abstraction gaps keeping it below 5.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly states both the 'what' (implementation details for translation, SQL generation, bulk operations) and the 'when' ('Use when changing expression visitors, SqlExpressions, ... or related classes') with concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Good keyword coverage using precise internal type names (QuerySqlGenerator, ShaperProcessingExpressionVisitor, ExecuteUpdate/ExecuteDelete) a developer would naturally say, though it lacks broader natural synonyms needed for a 5.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The highly specific class names (ShaperProcessingExpressionVisitor, UpdateExpression, DeleteExpression, QuerySqlGenerator) carve out a clear niche with minimal overlap risk against other skills.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
dotnet/efcore
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.