CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

update-pipeline

Implementation details for EF Core SaveChanges and the update pipeline. Use when changing CommandBatchPreparer, UpdateSqlGenerator, ModificationCommand, or related classes.

65

Quality

82%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

An exemplary lean reference: dense with non-obvious implementation knowledge, zero token waste, and clean section organization. Its weakness is that it is purely descriptive — no executable verification commands, no source paths, and no explicit change-and-validate workflow for the batch database operations it covers.

Suggestions

Add concrete verification commands (e.g., the relevant EF Core test invocation for the update pipeline) so a change can be validated against the expectations in the Validation section.

Frame a short 'when changing X, check Y' workflow that ties the Flow and Validation sections into explicit checkpoints (e.g., preserving dependency ordering and shared-row original-value rules) rather than leaving them as system descriptions.

Include file paths for the key classes (CommandBatchPreparer, UpdateSqlGenerator, ModificationCommand) so the guidance is directly actionable when editing the codebase.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The ~25-line body carries non-obvious implementation knowledge in every line ('SharedTableEntryMap is used to track entries mapped to the same row', 'Topological sort via Multigraph (FK dependency ordering)') with zero padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, matching the 'lean and efficient; assumes Claude's competence' anchor.

5 / 5

Actionability

It provides specific, concrete technical detail (class names, the shared-row original-value invariant, concurrency behavior), but there is no executable guidance — no test commands, source file paths, or edit procedures — so it matches 'some concrete guidance but incomplete' rather than the 'mostly executable guidance' anchor, and is clearly above the high-level-hints anchor.

3 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The Flow section sequences the internal pipeline clearly (SaveChanges() through AcceptAllChanges()), but it describes how the system executes rather than steps for Claude to follow, and the Validation section lists expected properties ('returns expected affected row count', 'store-generated values propagate back') without explicit checkpoints or a validate-fix-retry feedback loop — a gap the rubric caps at 3 for batch database operations.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is under 50 lines with no bundle files and four clean, well-labeled sections (Flow, Concurrency, Shared-Row Value Access, Validation); per the simple-skill exception, well-organized sections alone justify the top anchor with no external references needed.

5 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, tight description: explicit what and a highly specific when clause anchored to concrete class names, with excellent distinctiveness. Its only weakness is that the capability statement is a generic 'implementation details' framing rather than a list of concrete actions or covered topics.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain precisely ('EF Core SaveChanges and the update pipeline') and lists concrete class names (CommandBatchPreparer, UpdateSqlGenerator, ModificationCommand), but the capability statement is a generic container ('Implementation details for') rather than enumerated concrete actions, matching the 'names domain and 1-2 concrete actions' anchor rather than the 'lists several specific actions' anchor.

3 / 5

Completeness

It explicitly answers both questions with concrete trigger phrases: the 'what' is 'Implementation details for EF Core SaveChanges and the update pipeline' and the 'when' is 'Use when changing CommandBatchPreparer, UpdateSqlGenerator, ModificationCommand, or related classes' — a 'when' clause more specific than the anchor-4 example where the 'when' 'could be more explicit'.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Phrases like 'EF Core SaveChanges', 'update pipeline', 'CommandBatchPreparer', 'UpdateSqlGenerator', and 'ModificationCommand' are exactly what a developer changing this code would say, matching 'good keyword coverage; a few natural terms missing' — common variations like 'SaveChangesAsync', 'ModificationCommandBatch', or 'DbUpdateConcurrencyException' are absent, so it falls short of the comprehensive-synonym anchor.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A clear niche (EF Core save-pipeline internals) with distinct triggers tied to named framework classes; it would not plausibly fire for any unrelated skill, matching the 'clear niche with distinct triggers; minimal conflict risk' anchor.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository

dotnet/efcore

Path

.agents/skills/update-pipeline/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.