Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, highly actionable rulebook with concrete label mappings, tie-breakers, and a label-verification checkpoint for batch safety. Its main weaknesses are redundant repetition of the Tizen and prohibition rules (conciseness) and the absence of an explicit step-ordered workflow or an apply-label tool reference.
Suggestions
State the Tizen exclusion and the other-label prohibition once each in the Scope section and reference them briefly elsewhere, cutting roughly a dozen redundant lines.
Add a short numbered workflow (fetch labels -> determine area -> determine platforms -> verify candidate labels exist -> apply) to make the sequence and validation checkpoint explicit.
Name the tool/command used to actually apply a label (e.g., the add/update-label MCP tool) so the final action step is executable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient rule statements with no concept padding, but it could be tightened: the Tizen exclusion is repeated in four places ('Scope', platform-notes, issue rules, 'What NOT to do') and the full other-label prohibition list appears nearly verbatim in both 'Scope' and 'What NOT to do'. This matches 'mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened'. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, directly executable guidance: a file-pattern-to-label mapping table, exact label names, tie-break examples (e.g., 'TabbedPage.tizen.cs -> area-controls-tabbedpage'), and named MCP tools (list_label, get_label). Minor gap: no tool or command is given for actually applying a label, keeping it just below fully copy-paste ready. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear implied sequence exists (label discovery with pagination caveat -> area rules -> platform rules -> noop conditions) and an explicit verification checkpoint is present ('verify it exists with the `get_label` tool'), satisfying the validation requirement for a batch labeling skill. The sequence is never explicitly ordered as steps, matching 'clear sequence with most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps'. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a single self-contained file (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ exist) with well-organized, clearly headed sections covering scope, discovery, rules, and prohibitions. Structure is good and content appropriately placed, though at ~120 lines the rule tables are borderline monolithic and could be split, matching the 'good structure; minor organization gaps' anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |