review-test-failures
Classifies PR CI/test failures as likely PR-caused or unrelated, compares against base-branch baseline, and emits an overall merge-readiness verdict. Uses gathered GitHub/AzDO/Helix context and the shared MAUI CI facts.
60
70%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./.github/skills/review-test-failures/SKILL.mdLow
Low-risk findings.
1 low severity finding. Worth noting, but not necessarily harmful.
W011: Third-party content exposure detected (indirect prompt injection risk).
What this means
The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.
Why it was flagged
[SKILL.md] describes a required runtime workflow that relies on context files produced by `.github/skills/review-test-failures/scripts/Gather-TestFailureContext.ps1`, and that gather script ingests CI/log text from GitHub checks, AzDO builds, Helix work item result files, and their console/xUnit contents at runtime via APIs and parsers (e.g., `Invoke-JsonUrl`, `Invoke-TextUrl`, `Invoke-HelixFileText`, `Get-XUnitFailures`, `Get-ConsoleFailureReason`), which are ultimately outsider-authored through PR commits/tests that drive those failures/logs.
- Repository
- dotnet/maui
- Commit
90afade
- Audited
- Security analysis
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.