Content
52%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is admirably concise but over-delegates: it points to an `@expert-reviewer` agent for everything, leaving the skill itself without executable guidance, a sequenced workflow, or genuine bundle-file navigation.
Suggestions
Add a brief in-skill summary of the review workflow (e.g., the named waves and their validation checkpoints) instead of delegating the entire methodology to @expert-reviewer, so the skill is actionable without the external agent.
Provide at least one concrete, executable artifact in the body — a representative checklist line, command, or example — to raise actionability beyond a pointer.
Either bundle the methodology into actual reference files under references/ and link them with clear one-level-deep navigation, or document why the @expert-reviewer agent is the single source of truth, so progressive disclosure is intentional rather than absent.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is three lean lines with no concept-padding or fluff ('Invoke `@expert-reviewer` for 24-dimension MSBuild code review'), where every token earns its place — the top 'lean and efficient' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | 'Invoke `@expert-reviewer`' is a concrete instruction, but the skill delegates entirely to an external agent and supplies no in-skill code, commands, or specific examples, matching the 'some concrete guidance but incomplete; missing key details' anchor rather than the copy-paste-ready top anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The body only mentions that a '4-wave workflow' lives inside another agent and provides no sequenced steps or validation checkpoints in-skill, matching the 'steps unclear or missing; no sequence for multi-step tasks' bottom anchor. | 1 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the only reference is an inline `@expert-reviewer` agent invocation that is not a discoverable file, so organization is minimal and references are not clearly signaled — closest to the 'some structure but could be better organized' anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 8 / 12 Passed |