Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured reference skill: executable snippets, clear container-selection guidance, a useful review checklist, and a clean one-level-deep reference bundle. The main improvement is trimming the long inline searchable/toast examples to keep the overview leaner.
Suggestions
Trim the .searchable section to the key modifiers (`.searchable`, `.searchScopes`, `.task(id:)` debounce) and move the full debounced-search view struct into references, shortening SKILL.md.
Shorten the toast overlay example to the `.overlay(alignment:)` + transition + auto-dismiss pattern and drop the surrounding struct boilerplate.
Tighten prose that restates code (e.g. 'Show a placeholder when search is empty. Debounce input...') into a single rule line or fold it into the Review Checklist.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is largely lean — decision bullets, a controls table, and terse rules like 'Never place GeometryReader inside lazy containers' — with no basic-concept padding. However, the .searchable section inlines a full ~40-line view struct and a few prose sentences restate what adjacent code shows, so minor trimming is possible. Not 5 (some over-length examples); not 3 (no unnecessary explanations of things Claude already knows). | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Code is copy-paste-ready with real modifiers and APIs — '.scrollPosition($scrollPosition)' with 'scrollPosition.scrollTo(edge: .bottom)', '.task(id: searchQuery)' debounce, GridItem adaptive/flexible columns, '.safeAreaBar(edge:)', safeAreaInset — plus a control decision table and concrete do/don't rules. Fully executable examples cover the common cases, matching the anchor-5 example. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | As a pattern-reference skill, the selection workflow is well sequenced ('When to use which' bullets, per-section use guidance) and the Review Checklist plus Common Mistakes act as checkpoints for review tasks. Not 5 because there is no explicit multi-step execution flow with validation checkpoints; not 3 because the checklist and mistake list provide clear checkpoints and the sequences present are coherent. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Each section gives a concise inline pattern and then a clearly signaled one-level-deep pointer — 'See [references/grids.md](references/grids.md) for full grid patterns and design choices' — and all four referenced files (grids.md, list.md, scrollview.md, form.md) exist in the bundle. With a contents list and appropriately split content, this matches the anchor-5 structure exactly. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |