spec-loop-setup-doc-rendering
Help set up and troubleshoot rendering for task files and glossary files. Use when the user asks about PlantUML, AsciiDoc, VS Code, Cursor, other VS Code-based IDEs, JetBrains, preview rendering, Java, or Graphviz needed to review rendered task or glossary files.
56
63%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
—
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./skills/spec-loop-setup-doc-rendering/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
89%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a solid description with excellent trigger term coverage and a clear 'Use when' clause that makes it highly selectable. Its main weakness is that the 'what' portion is somewhat general ('set up and troubleshoot') without listing specific concrete actions like installing dependencies, configuring preview extensions, or resolving specific rendering errors. The distinctiveness is strong due to the narrow domain focus.
Suggestions
Expand the 'what' portion with more specific actions, e.g., 'Install and configure PlantUML/AsciiDoc preview extensions, resolve Java/Graphviz dependency issues, and fix rendering errors in task and glossary files.'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | The description names the domain ('rendering for task files and glossary files') and mentions two actions ('set up and troubleshoot'), but doesn't list specific concrete actions like installing extensions, configuring settings, or diagnosing specific errors. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (set up and troubleshoot rendering for task/glossary files) and 'when' with an explicit 'Use when...' clause listing specific trigger scenarios and tools. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Excellent coverage of natural trigger terms users would say: 'PlantUML', 'AsciiDoc', 'VS Code', 'Cursor', 'JetBrains', 'preview rendering', 'Java', 'Graphviz', 'task files', 'glossary files'. These are specific, varied, and naturally match what users would mention. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The combination of rendering setup/troubleshooting specifically for task and glossary files, with tools like PlantUML, AsciiDoc, and specific IDEs, creates a very distinct niche unlikely to conflict with other skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
37%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill is essentially a thin routing document that directs users to IDE-specific setup files. While it is concise, it provides zero actionable content on its own—no troubleshooting steps, no commands, no examples. If the referenced files don't exist or are incomplete, this skill offers no fallback value whatsoever.
Suggestions
Add at minimum a brief troubleshooting checklist or common prerequisites (e.g., Java installation, Graphviz installation) directly in the SKILL.md so it provides standalone value.
Include at least one concrete, executable command or verification step (e.g., 'Verify Java is installed: `java -version`') to make the skill actionable even without the referenced files.
Add a simple workflow for diagnosing rendering issues (e.g., 1. Check prerequisites, 2. Verify extension installed, 3. Test with sample file) with validation checkpoints.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is extremely lean—just a few lines that direct the user to the appropriate setup document based on their IDE. No unnecessary explanation or padding. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill body contains no concrete guidance, commands, or code. It only points to other files without providing any actionable steps itself. If those referenced files don't exist (no bundle files were provided), the user gets nothing executable. | 1 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | There is no workflow, no sequenced steps, and no validation checkpoints. The skill is essentially a routing page with no process guidance for setup or troubleshooting. | 1 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill attempts progressive disclosure by referencing IDE-specific setup files, which is a reasonable structure. However, no bundle files were provided, so the referenced files (vscode-setup.md, jetbrains-setup.md) cannot be verified to exist, and the caveat 'Use only the setup documents that actually exist here' suggests uncertainty about their presence. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 7 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
- Repository
- dpolivaev/spec-loop
- Commit
90f996e
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.