Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-sequenced procedure body: every step is copy-paste executable with explicit failure and stop conditions. The main weakness is redundancy — the three actions, the no-writes guarantee, and the launch-result.json prohibition are each repeated two to three times, which costs conciseness without adding information.
Suggestions
State the three actions once in the numbered Procedure and trim the introductory repetition, keeping the intro to a 2–3 sentence purpose statement.
Collapse the duplicate boundary statements: "no Linear writes" and "do not write launch-result.json" each appear in both the Procedure/Notes and the 'What this skill deliberately omits' section — pick one location per point.
Merge the 'Notes' and 'What this skill deliberately omits' sections, since both cover the same boundaries-and-rationale material.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient — commands are given without teaching background — but several points are stated two or three times: the three-action list appears in the intro and again as the numbered procedure; "no Linear writes" appears in the intro, the omits section, and implicitly elsewhere; "do not write launch-result.json" is stated in step 3 and again under Notes and Omits. This is the anchor-3 fit ("mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened"); it is not 2 because there is no concept teaching or padding, and not 4 because the repetition is more than a minor instance. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance throughout: a complete curl command for the Linear GraphQL query, an exact run-marker line format with the `date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ` timestamp source, and a copy-paste-ready bash block for branch/commit/push/`gh pr create` with all three placeholders substituted in place. Not 4 because there are no gaps — even the failure mode ("If the response carries a GraphQL errors array or no issue, stop and report it") and the stop condition ("Then stop. Do not write launch-result.json") are explicit. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The three-step sequence is explicit with validation checkpoints: stop-and-report on a missing credential before starting, stop-and-report on a GraphQL errors array or empty issue after the read, and a defined terminal state (capture the PR URL, then stop). For a smoke test, halting on failure rather than retrying is the correct feedback behavior since failure is the signal, matching the anchor-5 pattern of explicit validation at each step; this is not a destructive or batch operation, so no cap applies. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good single-file structure with clear sections (Inputs table, three-step Procedure, Notes, deliberate omissions) and no nested references; the one cross-file pointer (frontmatter `schemas.output` → `./schemas/output.schema.json`) is one level deep and explained in the body. Not 5 because at ~145 lines some Notes/Omissions material duplicates earlier sections and the schema reference is not a well-signaled navigation element within the body's structure; not 3 because organization is genuinely good and nothing is buried. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |