Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplary lean skill body: fully concrete commands, explicit thresholds and flag criteria, and a clear ordered workflow with no wasted tokens. The only improvements are showing argument conventions for all four scripts and adding brief failure-handling guidance.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient — every line is actionable instruction ('build first with cargo build -p arch-tests -q, then for each changed .rs file run...') with zero concept explanation or padding; assumes Claude's competence throughout. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives exact commands and thresholds ('target/debug/check-fanout (flag score > 300)', 'pub structs or fns... should be pub(crate) instead') — mostly copy-paste ready, but argument usage is only shown for 'cohesion <file>' and unstated for the other three scripts. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | 'Run these checks in order' with four clearly sequenced sections and 'build first' ordering gives a clear sequence with flag criteria as checkpoints; minor gaps include no guidance on handling a failed build or missing spec file. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with well-organized sections and no need for external skill references — the only referenced file (architecture.spec.md) is a review target in the codebase, not a nested skill document. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |