Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is well-structured, actionable, and concise without padding, giving Claude concrete tool parameters, examples, and troubleshooting. The main gap is mild redundancy across the Capability and Examples sections and the absence of an explicit validation/retry loop for failure cases.
Suggestions
Factor the repeated per-tool parameter tables into a single shared parameter reference to reduce redundancy between Capability and Examples.
Add an explicit validate/retry step in Troubleshooting (e.g. 'after lowering threshold, re-run the same query') to close the workflow loop.
Show the '调用方式' as a concrete MCP tool invocation rather than only a natural-language flow arrow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and does not explain concepts Claude already knows, but the per-tool parameter lists repeat the same field definitions (query 1-500 chars, limit 1-100) and the Examples section re-states calls already shown in Capability — minor trimming possible, fitting the 'efficient with minor over-explanation' anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete parameters, a JSON response schema, executable curl health checks, and five worked tool-call examples give mostly executable guidance; it falls short of 5 because the '调用方式' is shown as a natural-language flow rather than a directly copy-pasteable invocation. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Prerequisites, call flow, and troubleshooting are clearly sequenced and search is non-destructive so the destructive-cap rule does not apply; it is not 5 because there is no explicit validate-then-retry checkpoint for the failing cases listed in Troubleshooting. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the skill is a self-contained, well-sectioned reference (When to use / Capability / Usage / Examples / Configuration / Troubleshooting); it is not 5 only because the full per-tool parameter reference is inlined where a one-level-deep REFERENCE.md could keep the overview leaner. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |