Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured with concrete commands, a clear sequenced workflow, a safety confirmation gate, and clean progressive disclosure into real reference files. The only real weakness is inline checklist duplication that overlaps the bundled references.
Suggestions
Trim the inline SRID/security/quality bullet lists to a brief pointer per area, letting the loaded reference checklists carry the detail and reducing token redundancy.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is largely lean and actionable, but the inline SRP/OCP/LSP/ISP/DIP, security, and quality bullet lists duplicate content already provided by the loaded reference checklists and could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable commands (git status -sb, git diff --stat, git diff, rg/grep) plus a copy-paste output template and a specific inline-comment format, rather than abstract direction. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Seven clearly sequenced steps with edge-case handling (no changes, large diff) and an explicit "Do NOT implement until user confirms" next-steps gate form a clear feedback loop. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A concise overview points to four well-signaled one-level-deep references, each loaded from its relevant section and mapped in a Resources table; all referenced files exist and are substantive. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |