Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A high-quality, operational skill body: executable code with literal parameter values, a sequenced workflow with explicit validation and authorization gates around the destructive delete operation, and clean delegation of the project/topic/edit/dependency variants to verified one-level-deep reference files. The only noticeable weakness is mild rule repetition between the inline workflow steps, the quoted question block, and the Required Rules section.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and operational — every line encodes product-specific rules Claude could not know, with no filler explaining generic concepts. It is not a 5 because some rules are repeated (e.g., 'Do not add unrequested files' appears in step 3 twice and again in Required Rules, and the access-method warnings appear both inline and in the quoted question block). | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance: exact tool signatures with literal string values ('access_type: "password" | "team" | "public"'), copy-paste-ready `tool.call(...)` snippets covering the common cases (find existing, create password, create public, delete), and precise result-field handling (`result.data["items"]`, `share_url`, `password`). Specific examples cover the common cases with no gaps. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 8-step File Share Workflow has a clear sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (list before create, confirm file set, ask before access creation) and the destructive delete operation is gated by explicit authorization rules ('A question such as "Do we still need this?" is not authorization', confirmed=True only on clear authorization). Error recovery is specified (check result.ok, missing-value handling, no auto-fallback to less secure access) and 'Required Rules' acts as a checklist — matching the top anchor, including the destructive-operation validation requirement. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a well-signaled overview: each less-common path ('the entire current project', 'the current topic', 'inspect or change an existing share', 'file may reference local assets') is delegated with a trigger condition to a real, verified one-level-deep reference in references/ (project-share.md, topic-share.md, edit-share.md, file-dependencies.md), and references point only back to SKILL.md or a sibling, never to further nested content. The most common file-share workflow and its tool signatures are appropriately kept inline. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |