Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill excels at organization and token efficiency, providing a clean overview that directs users to appropriate detailed files. However, it functions more as a navigation hub than an actionable skill—the main file lacks concrete examples, specific decision-making steps, or executable guidance. The validation checklist is helpful but would benefit from explicit workflow sequencing.
Suggestions
Add a concrete quick-start workflow showing the sequence: 1) Run context discovery → 2) Classify project → 3) Select patterns → 4) Document ADR, with explicit validation between steps
Include at least one minimal concrete example in the main file (e.g., a simple ADR template or a 3-question decision tree) so users can take immediate action without reading other files
Add feedback loop guidance for when validation checklist items fail (e.g., 'If requirements unclear → return to context-discovery.md and ask X questions')
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and efficient, using tables for quick reference and avoiding unnecessary explanations. Every section serves a clear purpose without padding or explaining concepts Claude already knows. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides a clear structure with file references and a validation checklist, but lacks concrete executable examples or specific commands. The guidance is organizational rather than directly actionable—it tells you where to look rather than what to do. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The validation checklist provides a sequence of considerations, but there's no explicit workflow for how to move through the architecture decision process. Missing feedback loops for iterating on decisions or handling validation failures. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Excellent use of progressive disclosure with a clear content map table showing exactly which files to read for which purpose. References are one level deep and well-signaled with descriptive 'When to Read' guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |