Content
66%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Well-structured, token-efficient overview that leverages progressive disclosure effectively. The body is descriptive rather than instructional, and the core build workflow is delegated to references rather than sequenced inline.
Suggestions
Add a brief inline numbered workflow (e.g., the first 2-3 roadmap steps) with an explicit validation checkpoint so the body stands on its own for workflow_clarity.
Include one small executable grader or eval-config snippet in the body so the main task is actionable without requiring a reference file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | A lean reference card of compact tables that assumes Claude's competence and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows; nearly every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete tracked_metrics YAML snippet and pass@k/pass^k math, but the executable guidance for actually building evals is deferred to reference files, leaving the body's guidance incomplete on its own. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The multi-step build process (roadmap steps 0-8) lives in roadmap.md rather than the body; the body itself contains no sequenced workflow or validation checkpoints. | 2 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview with well-signaled, one-level-deep references, all of which resolve to real files in ./references/, organized under a categorized Quick Reference section. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |