Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured instruction skill with a clear workflow and a ready-to-use output template. The main improvement opportunity is adding a short worked example of a completed spec to lift actionability and reinforce the workflow.
Suggestions
Add a brief, filled-in example spec (one or two sections populated) after the Output Pattern so the intended output shape is unambiguous.
Insert a single review step at the end of the Workflow (e.g., 'Re-read the spec for gaps against the acceptance criteria') to add an explicit checkpoint.
Consider one concrete line showing how an Example Prompt maps onto the Output Pattern sections, bridging the workflow and the examples.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — a one-sentence overview, terse numbered workflow, a default output structure, and three example prompts — with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides a concrete, copy-paste-ready output template (the Output Pattern skeleton) and three concrete example prompts, but stops short of a fully worked example spec, leaving a minor gap versus the fully-executable anchor at 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear, well-ordered seven-step workflow is present; this is non-destructive authoring so the missing-validation cap does not apply, but there are no explicit review/checkpoint steps, placing it just below the validation-with-feedback-loops anchor at 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | At under 50 lines with no need for external references, the content is well-organized into clear sections (Overview, Workflow, Output Pattern, Example Prompts), qualifying for the top anchor under the simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |