Meme coin and token security audit — rug pull detection (honeypot, hidden mint, fee manipulation, LP lock bypass), Solana SPL token analysis (freeze authority, mint authority, metadata mutability), Token-2022 extension risks (transfer hooks, permanent delegate), DEX liquidity pool attacks (sandwich amplification, LP drain, bonding curve exploits), pump.fun/Raydium/Jupiter integration risks, and real exploit examples from 2024-2025. Use for any token audit, rug pull assessment, meme coin security review, or pre-investment due diligence.
64
75%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./skills/meme-coin-audit/SKILL.mdFast-kill rug pull detection and deep token security analysis for EVM and Solana meme coins.
Check these BEFORE reading a single line of code. If any are true, skip the audit — the token is likely a rug or not worth the time.
"Check ALL authorities and owner functions. The retained authority IS the rug vector."
Every rug pull requires a privileged operation: mint, blacklist, fee change, LP removal, or authority abuse. If you find the privilege, you found the bug.
Common rug pattern. Deployer mints tokens post-launch, dumps on LP.
Quick grep (EVM):
grep -rn "function mint\|_mint(\|_balances\[.*\] +=" src/ --include="*.sol" | grep -v "test\|lib\|node_modules"Quick grep (Solana):
grep -rn "MintTo\|mint_to\|mint_authority" src/ --include="*.rs" | grep -v "test\|target"Kill if: MAX_SUPPLY enforced in every mint path, or mint function removed entirely.
Common scam pattern. Buy works, sell blocked.
Quick grep:
grep -rn "blacklist\|isBlacklisted\|_bots\|maxTxAmount\|approve.*override\|tradingEnabled" src/ --include="*.sol"Solana equivalent:
grep -rn "freeze_authority\|transfer_hook\|TransferHook\|permanent_delegate" src/ --include="*.rs"Kill if: No blacklist mapping, no transfer hooks, no freeze authority.
Common rug pattern. Sell fee set to 99% after initial buys.
Quick grep:
grep -rn "setFee\|setSellFee\|_taxFee\|_sellFee" src/ --include="*.sol"
grep -rn "function set.*Fee" -A5 src/ --include="*.sol" | grep -v "require\|MAX\|<="Kill if: Fee setter has require(fee <= MAX_FEE) with MAX_FEE <= 10%.
LP removal, migration, or manipulation to crash price.
Quick grep:
grep -rn "migrateLP\|emergencyWithdraw\|\.sync()\|setPair\|setRouter" src/ --include="*.sol"Kill if: LP tokens burned to dead address, no migration function, no pair setter.
Exploits in pump.fun-style bonding curves.
Quick grep:
grep -rn "virtualReserve\|setCurve\|graduate\|bonding_curve" src/ --include="*.sol" --include="*.rs"Kill if: Curve parameters immutable, graduation permissionless.
Retained mint/freeze/update authorities on Solana tokens.
Quick grep:
grep -rn "mint_authority\|freeze_authority\|update_authority\|close_authority" src/ --include="*.rs"
grep -rn "set_authority.*None" src/ --include="*.rs" # Good sign: revocationKill if: All authorities = None, verified on-chain.
Ownership appears renounced but backdoor control retained.
Quick grep:
grep -rn "renounceOwnership.*override\|_shadowAdmin\|_backupOwner\|selfdestruct" src/ --include="*.sol"Kill if: renounceOwnership NOT overridden, no second admin role, no selfdestruct.
Contract makes holders maximally sandwichable.
Quick grep:
grep -rn "swapExactTokensForETH" -A5 src/ --include="*.sol" | grep "0,"
grep -rn "swapThreshold\|_rebase\|mandatoryPool" src/ --include="*.sol"Kill if: Auto-swap has proper slippage, no rebase mechanics.
Run the 8 bug-class greps above across the source tree for fast red-flag detection. Together they catch:
Source grep does NOT check (verify these out-of-band):
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
pragma solidity ^0.8.0;
import "forge-std/Test.sol";
import "../src/Token.sol";
contract TokenExploitTest is Test {
Token token;
address owner = makeAddr("owner");
address victim = makeAddr("victim");
address attacker = makeAddr("attacker");
// Uniswap V2 router (mainnet fork)
address constant ROUTER = 0x7a250d5630B4cF539739dF2C5dAcb4c659F2488D;
address constant WETH = 0xC02aaA39b223FE8D0A0e5C4F27eAD9083C756Cc2;
function setUp() public {
vm.createSelectFork("mainnet");
// Deploy token as owner
vm.startPrank(owner);
token = new Token();
// Add liquidity...
vm.stopPrank();
}
function test_hiddenMint_rug() public {
// Step 1: Victim buys tokens
vm.startPrank(victim);
// ... buy tokens on Uniswap
vm.stopPrank();
// Step 2: Owner mints and dumps
vm.startPrank(owner);
uint256 supplyBefore = token.totalSupply();
token.mint(owner, 1_000_000_000e18);
assertGt(token.totalSupply(), supplyBefore, "Supply should increase");
// ... sell minted tokens
vm.stopPrank();
// Step 3: Victim's tokens are now worthless
// Assert token price crashed
}
function test_honeypot_blacklist() public {
// Step 1: Victim buys
vm.startPrank(victim);
// ... buy tokens
vm.stopPrank();
// Step 2: Owner blacklists victim
vm.startPrank(owner);
token.blacklist(victim);
vm.stopPrank();
// Step 3: Victim cannot sell
vm.startPrank(victim);
vm.expectRevert("Blacklisted");
token.transfer(address(1), 100e18);
vm.stopPrank();
}
function test_fee_manipulation_rug() public {
// Step 1: Verify initial fee is low
assertEq(token.sellFee(), 3); // 3%
// Step 2: Owner sets fee to 99%
vm.prank(owner);
token.setFees(3, 99); // Buy 3%, Sell 99%
// Step 3: Victim sells — loses 99% to fees
vm.startPrank(victim);
uint256 balanceBefore = address(victim).balance;
// ... sell tokens
// Assert: received almost nothing
vm.stopPrank();
}
}When you don't have source code, check on-chain:
1. MINT AUTHORITY → solana account <MINT> --output json | check mint_authority
- Should be null
- If Some(pubkey) → CRITICAL: can mint infinite tokens
2. FREEZE AUTHORITY → same as above, check freeze_authority
- Should be null
- If Some(pubkey) → CRITICAL: honeypot
3. LP STATUS → Check Raydium/Orca pool
- LP burned? (tokens sent to 1111...1111)
- LP locked? (in verified locker with no backdoor)
- LP held by deployer? → CRITICAL: instant rug
4. TOP HOLDERS → Birdeye/Solscan holders tab
- Top 10 < 30% of supply (excluding pools)
- Creator wallets (check first transactions)
5. PROGRAM UPGRADEABILITY
- Is the program upgradeable? → can change any logic
- Upgrade authority should be None for immutable programs
6. TOKEN-2022 EXTENSIONS
- Any transfer hook? → potential honeypot
- Permanent delegate? → CRITICALweb3-audit — When the target is a DeFi protocol (not just a token). Workflow primitive: this skill's 8 token-specific bug classes are a subset of web3-audit's scope; if the target has lending / vault / oracle logic beyond the token contract itself, also load web3-audit for the broader 10 DeFi bug classes.triage-validation — When deciding if a rug-pull finding qualifies as a bug bounty submission. Workflow primitive: many "rug vector" observations are pre-rug warnings, not exploitable bugs in a deployed protocol; run 7Q gate to distinguish "the deployer COULD rug" (informational) from "the contract IS exploitable now" (reportable).report-writing — When writing up a confirmed token security finding for Immunefi / private bounty. Workflow primitive: Foundry PoC template here feeds into report-writing's Immunefi body template.offensive-osint — When the token has off-chain infrastructure (project website, Telegram, deployer doxxing). Workflow primitive: on-chain audit is this skill's domain; deployer wallet history, social presence, and project legitimacy checks route to offensive-osint.bb-methodology — When confirming engagement mode. Workflow primitive: PART 0 separates "pre-investment due diligence" (this skill's primary use) from "Immunefi bug bounty submission" (different reporting + severity standards); the answer routes which post-audit handoff is correct.Engagement-derived + 2026-specific additions to the vendored foundation. Wisdom from real authorized engagements + Phase 2 verification across this repo's 31+ skill-area live tests. The upstream content covers the WHAT; this layer covers the WHEN-IT-WORKS-vs-WHEN-IT-DOESN'T.
Token-2022 transfer hooks are the new rug-pull vector. Hook authority can be set to a single key; that key can pause / blacklist / fee-on-transfer arbitrary addresses post-launch. Always check hook authority + permanent-delegate authority for Token-2022 mints:
# get mint extensions for a Token-2022 mint
spl-token display <MINT_ADDRESS> --program-id TokenzQdBNbLqP5VEhdkAS6EPFLC1PHnBqCXEpPxuEb
# look for: TransferHook { authority: ... }, PermanentDelegate { delegate: ... }If TransferHook authority is non-null → the holder of that key can revoke transfer rights mid-trade. If PermanentDelegate is non-null → that delegate can move any holder's tokens at any time (effectively a built-in confiscation). Either alone is rug-class.
pump.fun bonding curves can be manipulated via the curve's K-parameter; mint authority retained beyond bonding-curve completion is the classic exit-scam shape. Check mintAuthority AFTER the curve completes — legitimate launches null it, scams retain it for the post-graduation dump.
transfer() succeeds in dry-run but fails on certain addresses (sender allowlist / blocklist). Test with: simulated buy → simulated transfer to a different address → simulated sell. If buy + transfer succeed but sell fails, it's a honeypot.
Quick triage matrix:
| Test | Honeypot Signal |
|---|---|
| Buy from random wallet | Succeeds (must — or no one would touch it) |
| Transfer to second random wallet | Often fails on honeypot |
| Sell from original wallet | Fails or applies > 50% tax |
| Sell from team-controlled wallet | Succeeds (the giveaway) |
Cross-source verification: solana-rugcheck, rugcheck.xyz, dexscreener risk signals, honeypot.is (EVM). Never trust a single source — rug-checkers can be fooled by deferred-malice patterns (clean for first 7 days, hook activates later).
LP-lock badges on DexScreener mean nothing without on-chain verification. Check the actual lock contract (Unicrypt, TeamFinance, Bonkbot, PinkLock) for:
Some "locked" LPs are 1-day locks renewed weekly — visually the same as a year lock to the buyer, but the deployer can let it lapse on any Tuesday. Always read the lock contract source on the chain explorer.
The 6-question fast filter:
Five "no"s = walk away. Three "no"s = high risk, only enter with size you'd walk away from. Two "no"s with strong narrative + thin liquidity = the canonical retail trap.
Buying into a mint with < $50K liquidity guarantees you'll be sandwiched. The bot infrastructure on Solana and Ethereum is institutionalized in 2026 — Jito MEV-share and private order-flow auctions. If your trade size > 1% of available liquidity, expect sandwich loss > 5%; > 5% of liquidity, expect > 20% slippage from sandwich alone.
Mitigations (rank by 2026 effectiveness):
If the mint is so illiquid that even split orders sandwich — that's the signal to skip the trade, not the signal to use better tooling.
6b9c96e
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.