Content
84%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-sequenced instruction skill that respects the context window and includes explicit validation and destructive-action guards, though it could add a concrete response template.
Suggestions
Add a short response-format template or example mapping a review item to a change and verification result to make step 5 more copy-paste actionable.
Optionally include the concrete git/diff command(s) to use when re-reading the final diff in step 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean body that assumes Claude's competence; no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line directs action. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Gives concrete classification categories and explicit 'do/don't' boundaries, but provides no executable commands or templates (e.g., response format, diff/commit commands) for an instruction skill. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Five clearly sequenced steps with an explicit re-read/validation checkpoint (step 5) and explicit handling of unresolved items and unrun checks, plus a destructive-action guard. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A sub-50-line single-purpose skill with well-organized sections and no need for external references, scoring 3 under the simple-skill note. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |