CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

repro-api

Reproduce an EmDash bug that lives below the browser layer -- REST handlers, CLI, MCP, migrations, schema registry, or build tooling. No agent-browser. Prefer a failing vitest test in the affected package.

69

Quality

83%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

An exceptionally actionable and concise procedural skill: concrete commands, exact paths, explicit validation checkpoints, and clear skip/output guidance, all within a well-organized single file.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and dense — prohibitions, a numbered procedure, skip conditions, and an output spec — with no padding explaining concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place.

3 / 3

Actionability

Gives concrete executable guidance: exact package paths, commands like 'pnpm --filter <package> test <path>', the setupTestDatabase()/setupForDialect() utilities from tests/utils/test-db.ts, and a precise test-naming convention.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The seven-step procedure is clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints ('confirm it fails for the reason the user reported, not for an unrelated setup error', 'Confirm the failure mode matches') and an error-recovery loop that lowers confidence on adjacent failures.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

A compact single-file skill with no external references and well-organized sections (prohibitions, procedure, skip, output); per the rubric this qualifies for a top score without bundle files.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Description

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A specific, well-scoped description that names concrete subsystems and a preferred reproduction form, but it omits an explicit 'Use when' trigger and leans on project-internal jargon rather than natural user terms.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when ...' clause naming the natural trigger conditions (e.g. reproducing an API/CLI/migration/build bug) to lift completeness to 3.

Soften internal jargon (e.g. 'EmDash', 'agent-browser') with more widely recognizable phrasing so trigger terms read like what a user would actually say.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete targets ('REST handlers, CLI, MCP, migrations, schema registry, or build tooling') and a concrete preferred action ('Prefer a failing vitest test in the affected package').

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly states what the skill does, but lacks an explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause; per the guidelines a missing explicit trigger caps completeness at 2.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Contains relevant domain terms (CLI, migration, REST handlers) but leans on internal jargon ('EmDash', 'agent-browser', 'schema registry') rather than natural user phrasing, and omits common variations.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The 'below the browser layer' / 'No agent-browser' scoping plus the enumerated subsystem niche make it clearly distinguishable and unlikely to trigger the wrong skill.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
emdash-cms/emdash
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.