review

Review one pull request for real bugs, regressions, and convention violations. Enumerate candidate issues across the whole diff, verify each against the code, then return structured line-anchored findings and a verdict. Read-only on GitHub; the orchestrator posts the review.

Quality

80%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./infra/flue-review/.flue/skills/review/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is highly actionable with a clear, validated workflow and lean organization; it scores well across all dimensions, with only minor room to tighten phrasing and slightly improve file structure.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is dense and task-relevant throughout with no padding about concepts Claude already knows; only minor rhetorical flourishes could be trimmed.	4 / 5
Actionability	Provides concrete, executable `code`/`state.*` examples with real arguments plus a precise method, severity/verdict definitions, and a full output schema — copy-paste ready guidance.	5 / 5
Workflow Clarity	The 'frame, enumerate, verify' method is an explicit numbered sequence with a validation checkpoint (verify each candidate) and a self-correction feedback loop (drop unconfirmed candidates).	5 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Self-contained single file with clear section headers and one well-signaled external reference (the `writing-emdash-docs` skill for doc diffs); good structure with no nested references, though some inlined guidance could conceptually be split out.	4 / 5
	Total	18 / 20 Passed

Description

71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and action-rich with good distinctiveness, but it omits an explicit trigger clause, leaving the 'when to use' guidance only weakly implied and capping completeness at 3.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when reviewing a pull request, checking a diff for bugs/regressions, or auditing convention violations' clause to raise completeness.

Include common synonyms such as 'PR' and 'code review' alongside 'pull request' to improve trigger-term coverage.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Enumerates multiple concrete actions — enumerate candidate issues, verify each against the code, return structured line-anchored findings, and a verdict — giving comprehensive coverage of what the skill does.	5 / 5
Completeness	The 'what' is clear and detailed, but there is no explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause; 'when' is only weakly implied, so completeness is capped at 3 per the rubric guideline.	3 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Includes natural terms a user would say ('pull request', 'bugs', 'regressions', 'convention violations', 'diff') but misses common synonyms such as 'PR' or 'code review'.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The PR-review niche with line-anchored findings and a verdict is mostly distinct, with only minor overlap risk against generic code-review skills.	4 / 5
	Total	16 / 20 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
relative_links	Relative link issues: 1 suspicious	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: emdash-cms/emdash
Path: infra/flue-review/.flue/skills/review/SKILL.md
Commit: 9ca2de5

Reviewed: 3 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.