Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, highly actionable PR-review methodology with a clearly sequenced workflow, explicit self-correction checkpoints, and well-organized single-file structure that needs no external references.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and assumes Claude's competence throughout — it explains no basic concepts (what a PR or bug is) and every section adds non-obvious methodology or calibration guidance rather than padding, matching the lean-and-efficient anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides concrete, copy-pasteable tool calls (e.g. state.readFile/state.searchFiles with full option objects) and a fully specified output schema (verdict, summary, findings with path/line/side/severity/body), matching the fully-executable anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The method is a clearly numbered sequence (frame, enumerate, verify, go deep, prioritize) with explicit self-correction checkpoints ('drop candidates that turn out fine; do not report hypotheses you couldn't confirm') and a calibration checklist, matching the clear-sequence-with-explicit-validation anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | There are no bundle files and no nested references; the skill is a single well-organized file with clear section headers and the only external file (AGENTS.md) is supplied in context rather than linked for navigation, so well-organized sections suffice for a top score. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |