Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A dense, well-structured migration-decision skill that names concrete APIs and capabilities, sequences the work clearly, and points to sibling skills for implementation detail. The only weakness is the absence of an explicit error-recovery feedback loop in the verify stage for batch/data operations.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validate→fix→retry loop in the "Verify equivalent behavior" section, e.g., what to do when imported-data assertions or plugin tests fail before re-running.
Consider a short "if a mapped behavior fails verification" recovery step linking back to the responsibility-assignment or data-movement sections.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean throughout: it assumes Claude knows WordPress/PHP/Astro and spends every section on migration decisions rather than background, with no padded explanations. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The responsibility table names exact EmDash extension points and capability strings (e.g., "ctx.kv", "ctx.storage.<collection>", "users:read", "network:request", "admin.editorPanels"), giving concrete actionable guidance without needing code samples. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sections sequence a clear Understand → Assign → Choose → Plan → Verify → Deliver flow with an early "report the gap" checkpoint and a verification checklist, but it lacks an explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop for the batch/data-migration operations. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | It is a clear overview with two well-signaled one-level-deep references to sibling skills ([creating-plugins], [building-emdash-site]) for API detail, and explicitly states this skill covers only migration decisions, splitting content appropriately. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |