Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a lean, well-structured process skill with concrete gating and validation checkpoints throughout both delivery paths. Its only weakness is minor: it gives specific tool/field names but not exact command signatures, leaving actionability just short of fully executable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and directive with no padding and no re-explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line earns its place, fitting the 'lean and efficient, assumes Claude's competence' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and executable, naming specific tools and fields (edit_file, exec, publish_candidate, report_result, fixed, implemented, verdict) with clear gating; it stops short of copy-paste-ready code/signatures, fitting 'mostly executable, minor gaps' rather than the fully executable 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Both paths are clearly numbered with explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops ('Set fixed: true only after publish_candidate succeeds'; 'If reporter-only information prevents a reproduction… report verdict: unclear'; final focused verification pass before publish), fitting the top anchor with explicit validation and error-recovery loops. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a single-purpose skill under 50 lines with no external references needed, and it is cleanly sectioned (Bug path, Enhancement or task path, Shared constraints); per the simple-skills scoring note, well-organized sections alone warrant a 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |