CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

exploring-codebase

Systematic codebase exploration that maps architecture, components, and dependencies. Use when you need to understand how a feature works across a codebase, explore an unfamiliar project's architecture, trace data flow through multiple layers, or plan changes that span several components. Maps the high-level structure first, then dispatches parallel agents to explore each area in depth. Produces a synthesis with file:line references, execution flows, and actionable recommendations.

87

1.63x
Quality

81%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

90%

1.63x

Average score across 6 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Evaluation results

72%

36%

Understand Order Processing Before Adding Checkout Feature

Two-phase exploration process and synthesis output format

Criteria
Without context
With context

Mandatory announcement

0%

37%

Red flags checklist

0%

0%

Phase 1 before Phase 2

0%

100%

Haiku for discovery

0%

0%

Sonnet for deep dives

0%

0%

State tracking block

0%

100%

State tracking updated

0%

100%

Parallel deep-dive dispatch

0%

100%

Synthesis: Architecture Overview

100%

100%

Synthesis: Component Map

100%

100%

Synthesis: per-perspective analysis

100%

100%

Synthesis: Integration Points

100%

100%

Synthesis: Recommendations

100%

100%

81%

21%

Urgent: Diagnose User Registration Failures

Pressure resistance and mandatory announcement with red flags

Criteria
Without context
With context

Mandatory announcement

0%

40%

Production pressure flag checked

0%

33%

Does not just grep

100%

100%

Explains systematic over ad-hoc

100%

100%

Phase 1 performed first

20%

100%

State tracking present

0%

37%

Explains trade-offs to user

90%

100%

Synthesis sections present

87%

100%

File:line references

100%

100%

No premature completion

100%

100%

91%

44%

Add Distributed Tracing to Microservices Platform

Adaptive parallel deep dives and per-component synthesis

Criteria
Without context
With context

Discovery before deep dives

0%

100%

One deep-dive per service

0%

100%

Parallel deep-dive dispatch

0%

100%

PERSPECTIVES_FOUND tracked

0%

25%

DEEP_DIVES_COMPLETE tracked

0%

62%

Per-service analysis sections

100%

100%

Cross-cutting patterns

50%

100%

Integration points section

100%

100%

Actionable guidance not raw dumps

100%

100%

File:line evidence

100%

100%

Recommendations section

100%

100%

100%

Payment Processor Function Reference

Skip-when criteria compliance

Criteria
Without context
With context

Function signature present

100%

100%

All parameters documented

100%

100%

Parameter types correct

100%

100%

Return value documented

100%

100%

Errors/exceptions documented

100%

100%

No discovery report produced

100%

100%

No skill state tracking block

100%

100%

No multi-phase process documented

100%

100%

Approach is direct lookup

100%

100%

Approach explains why

100%

100%

100%

70%

Onboarding Architecture Discovery for Inventory API

Discovery output format and deep-dive context passing

Criteria
Without context
With context

## DISCOVERY SUMMARY section

0%

100%

## ARCHITECTURE PATTERN section

0%

100%

## COMPONENTS/MODULES section

0%

100%

## LAYERS/BOUNDARIES section

0%

100%

## RECOMMENDED DEEP DIVES section

0%

100%

Architecture confidence level

0%

100%

Components table has paths

25%

100%

File:line evidence in discovery

0%

100%

No speculation in discovery

100%

100%

Dispatch plan includes target

100%

100%

Dispatch plan includes area path

100%

100%

Dispatch plan includes focus points

100%

100%

Sonnet model in dispatch plan

0%

100%

100%

38%

Price Handling Architecture Investigation

Deep-dive output format and synthesis conflict resolution

Criteria
Without context
With context

Deep-dive SUMMARY sections

0%

100%

Deep-dive ENTRY POINTS sections

25%

100%

Deep-dive EXECUTION FLOW sections

50%

100%

Deep-dive DATA TRANSFORMATIONS sections

50%

100%

Deep-dive INTEGRATION POINTS sections

25%

100%

Pricing representation documented

100%

100%

Conflict identified in synthesis

100%

100%

Conflict resolution in synthesis

100%

100%

Cross-cutting patterns section

100%

100%

Integration points in synthesis

75%

100%

File:line evidence throughout

0%

100%

No unsupported speculation

100%

100%

Repository
emptyaltoidstin/ntm-orchestrator
Evaluated
Agent
Claude Code
Model
Claude Sonnet 4.6

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.