Display and filter security findings from Endor Labs. Use when the user says "show findings", "list vulnerabilities", "what did the scan find", "endor findings", "show me critical reachable vulns", or wants to browse/filter results after a scan. Supports filtering by severity, reachability, category (vuln/sast/secrets/license). Do NOT use for running a new scan (/endor-scan) or explaining a specific CVE (/endor-explain).
77
96%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
—
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is an excellent skill description that hits all the marks. It provides specific capabilities, abundant natural trigger terms, explicit 'Use when' guidance, and clear negative boundaries that distinguish it from related skills. The inclusion of 'Do NOT use for' clauses referencing specific other skills is a best practice for avoiding conflicts in a multi-skill environment.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple concrete actions: display findings, filter by severity, reachability, category (vuln/sast/secrets/license). Also explicitly states what it does NOT do (running scans, explaining CVEs), which adds specificity. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (display and filter security findings from Endor Labs with specific filter dimensions) and 'when' (explicit 'Use when' clause with multiple trigger phrases). Also includes negative boundaries ('Do NOT use for...') which further clarifies scope. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Excellent coverage of natural trigger phrases: 'show findings', 'list vulnerabilities', 'what did the scan find', 'endor findings', 'show me critical reachable vulns', plus domain terms like severity, reachability, and category types. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Highly distinctive with explicit negative boundaries referencing other skills (/endor-scan, /endor-explain), clear niche of browsing/filtering findings, and specific product name (Endor Labs). Very unlikely to conflict with other skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-crafted skill with excellent conciseness and actionability. The filter reference table, output template, and priority ordering provide Claude with everything needed to execute the task. The only weakness is that referenced bundle files (cli-parsing.md, reachability-tags.md, data-sources.md) are not provided, making it impossible to verify the progressive disclosure structure is complete.
Suggestions
Ensure the referenced files (references/cli-parsing.md, references/reachability-tags.md, references/data-sources.md) exist in the bundle to support the progressive disclosure references.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every section is lean and purposeful. The filter reference table is compact, the workflow steps are minimal, and there's no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. No wasted tokens. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete API filter strings, exact CLI commands, a complete output template with markdown table format, and specific next-step commands. The filter mapping table is directly executable guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 3-step sequence (Query → Interpret → Present) with multiple options for querying. Priority ordering is explicit, error handling covers key failure modes with specific recovery actions, and the default filter behavior is clearly stated. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | References to external files (references/cli-parsing.md, references/reachability-tags.md, references/data-sources.md) are well-signaled and one level deep, but no bundle files were provided, so we cannot verify these references actually exist. The main content is well-structured with appropriate inline detail. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
b958adc
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.