Conciseness

The body is lean and trap-focused: each section states one gotcha in a sentence or two plus a command, assumes Claude's competence ("Move both into request-time code or lazy thunks"), and adds nothing Claude already knows. Every token earns its place; not 4 because there is no over-explanation to trim.

Actionability

Mostly copy-paste-ready commands: `bunx wrangler tail <worker-name> --env production`, the grep/sed/printf secret pipe, `bunx wrangler deploy --env production`, and the concrete `[[env.production.routes]]` directive. Minor gaps keep it from 5 — the secret snippet uses an undefined `$SF` variable and section 4 gives direction ("Move both into request-time code") without an example.

Workflow Clarity

Sections are numbered in a sensible order (tail the failing worker first, then secrets, then deploy) and section 4 includes an explicit verification checkpoint ("Verify with a real `wrangler deploy`; `--dry-run` does not catch it"). Not 5 because production-mutating operations in sections 2–3 (secret put, deploy) lack a post-change verification step; not 3 because a diagnostic-first sequence and one explicit checkpoint are present.

Progressive Disclosure

Under 50 lines with clear numbered sections, no bundle files, and bulk material (tier map, secrets checklist, deploy steps) correctly pushed to clearly-signaled wiki files (`wiki/shared/production-deploy.md`, `wiki/shared/dev-environment.md`) in the opening line — matching the simple-skill exception for well-organized short skills.

Specificity

The description lists several specific covered items — "the secret-setting trap for JSON and JWK values", "why a secret change needs a redeploy", "the module-evaluation crash on a first deploy" — which are concrete and domain-anchored. It falls short of 5 because the items are topics covered rather than executable actions, and "where to look first" is generic.

Completeness

Both halves are present: an explicit trigger clause ("Use when a deployed Cloudflare Worker in this repository misbehaves or fails to deploy ... or when setting or rotating a Worker secret") and a stated scope ("Covers where to look first, ..."). Not 5 because the 'what' reads as a table of contents of topics rather than clearly stating what the skill does (diagnose and fix these failures).

Trigger Term Quality

Natural user phrases are present: "misbehaves", "fails to deploy", "setting or rotating a Worker secret", "redeploy". A few natural variations are missing (e.g., wrangler, deploy errors, production issues), keeping it below the comprehensive-synonyms anchor of 5.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche — debugging deployed Cloudflare Workers in this repository, naming specific workers (osn-api, cire-api), secrets, and deploy failures — with distinct triggers and minimal overlap risk with other skills. Not lower: no generic phrasing that a differently-scoped skill would also match.