Content
56%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill has a clear routing workflow with useful scope-narrowing assets and a concrete answer template, but the bundle is internally inconsistent: the five dispatched agent files are missing while five query-pattern reference files exist unlinked, and the domain-to-agent mapping is repeated three times. Fixing the reference chain would substantially raise actionability and progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Add the missing agents/ files (framework, eds, skills, docs, backend-code .agent.md) or repoint the dispatch steps to the existing references/*.query.md files so the workflow's core instructions are actually reachable.
Link references/*.query.md from SKILL.md (or from each agent file) so the per-domain query patterns and evidence checklists are discoverable instead of orphaned.
Deduplicate the domain-to-agent mapping — keep the Step 1 table and replace the Step 2 bullet list and 'Research agents' section with brief pointers — and trim the overlapping platform-guidance trigger bullets to 2-3 representative examples.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is skill-specific with no generic concept explanations, but it is noticeably redundant: the domain-to-agent mapping is stated three times (the Step 1 table, the Step 2 dispatch list, and the 'Research agents' section), and the 14-bullet trigger list contains overlapping variants ('How does Fusion handle X at the platform level?', 'What is the Fusion platform guidance on Y?', 'What are the guidelines for Z in the Fusion platform?'). This goes beyond anchor 4's 'minor instances' of trimming, but is not heavily padded enough for anchor 2. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | The classification table with domain indicators, the dispatch mapping, and the slot-based answer template are concrete, but the dispatch instructions ('follow agents/framework.agent.md') point to five agent files that are not present in the bundle, so the executable core of the workflow is missing. Meanwhile the actual query-pattern files (references/*.query.md) exist but are never linked, leaving key execution details unreachable — matching anchor 3's 'concrete guidance but incomplete; missing key details'. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 0-3 are clearly sequenced with decision rules ('Skip this step if the question already names a specific artifact', 'If the question spans multiple domains, answer each domain separately') and real checkpoints in Safety & constraints ('capture the source path and supporting excerpt before finalizing any claim', 'state uncertainty after one refinement pass per agent'). The research flow is read-only, so the destructive/batch validation cap does not apply; the gap keeping it below anchor 5 is that the MCP-unavailable fallback lives only in frontmatter, not in the step sequence. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Scored against the actual bundle: SKILL.md itself is a clean overview with well-signaled links, but all five central references (agents/*.agent.md) are dead paths — no agents/ directory exists — and the five real reference files (references/*.query.md) are orphaned, never referenced from SKILL.md or any reachable file. Anchor 3's 'some structure but could be better organized' fits: the in-document structure is good, but the one-level-deep navigation chain is broken. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |