Conciseness

Mostly efficient orchestration prose, but genuine duplication: 'Final Verification' and 'After Implementation' both mandate running the full test suite and verifying acceptance criteria, and gate-failure handling is stated three times (loop step f, 'Gate Failures', and Remediation step 5). Not 4: the redundancy exceeds 'minor instances that could be trimmed'.

Actionability

Concrete tool calls (beads:ready, beads:show, beads:close, beads:create, beads:list), an explicit label taxonomy, title templates like 'P{N}: Remediate — {Phase Name} (attempt {M})', and a worked progress-report example. Not 5: the core loop is control-flow pseudocode and the agent prompt templates are deferred entirely to workflow-detail.md, leaving minor gaps at dispatch time.

Workflow Clarity

Clear sequence (identify epic → orchestration loop → report progress → final verification) with explicit validation gates (RED/GREEN), a remediation feedback loop capped at 2 attempts, STOP-and-escalate rules, and a 'What Not to Do' checklist. Matches the top anchor: explicit validation steps, error-recovery feedback loops, and a checklist for a complex process.

Progressive Disclosure

The body is a well-organized overview with the core loop inline, and details (agent prompt templates, dispatch procedures) are split into a single clearly-signaled reference (references/workflow-detail.md), verified to exist and only one level deep with no nested references. Not 4: the split and navigation are exactly appropriate for the content volume.

Specificity

Multiple specific concrete actions cover the full pipeline ('writes tests first, runs them red, then implements code to make them green, then validates nothing is broken'), with the capability stated in third person. Not 4: there are no coverage gaps within its niche of plan-driven TDD implementation.

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ('implements a feature by executing a plan phase-by-phase — writes tests first...') and when ('Use when you have a plan from /draft and are ready to implement...'). Not 4: both halves are concrete and fully explicit rather than merely present.

Trigger Term Quality

Good keyword coverage with synonym spread ('implement, build, develop, create, or write code for a feature using TDD') plus the '/draft' anchor. Not 5: common natural phrases like 'execute the plan', 'make the tests pass', or 'test-driven' are missing.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The 'plan from /draft' dependency carves a clear niche, but the broad trigger verbs ('implement, build, develop, create, or write code') leave minor overlap risk with general coding skills. Not 5: those generic verbs could plausibly fire without a /draft plan present.