Conciseness

Mostly efficient, project-specific instruction, but template.md is referenced five times while the body still re-lists the required sections, Agent Context required fields, and good/bad test-spec examples that the template carries in full; 'Test Specifications at Boundaries' and 'Agent Context Blocks' largely repeat Step 3 content.

Actionability

Highly actionable — exact output path pattern, named beads commands (beads:epic, beads:dep, beads:label, beads:ready), a concrete 6-phase decomposition example, and a fully specified Inline Task Graph fallback. Minor gaps: beads commands lack invocation syntax and the inline example ends with '...' placeholders.

Workflow Clarity

Clear numbered sequence (Steps 1-5 plus 3b) with explicit validation: a beads availability check with fallback mode, RED/GREEN gates, per-phase verification checklists, an Approval Checklist section, a user review loop in Step 4, and session recovery via beads:ready — feedback loops and checklists are all present.

Progressive Disclosure

Good structure: the full 496-line plan template is appropriately split into a real, one-level-deep, clearly signaled reference, and the body stays at overview altitude. Not a 5 because required-fields lists and test-spec good/bad examples are duplicated between body and template — a minor organization gap.

Specificity

Names the domain and two concrete actions ('Consumes research artifact or topic and produces compact implementation plan with test specs and Agent Context blocks'), but coverage is not comprehensive and relies on unexplained internal jargon ('RPI methodology', 'Agent Context blocks').

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ('produces compact implementation plan with test specs and Agent Context blocks') and when ('Use after research or to start planning a non-trivial feature'). Not a 5 because the 'when' states conditions rather than concrete user trigger phrases.

Trigger Term Quality

Natural terms users would say are present — 'plan', 'implementation plan', 'research', 'planning a non-trivial feature' — but a few synonyms (e.g., 'roadmap', 'spec') are missing, short of comprehensive anchor-5 coverage.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Anchored to a distinct niche (RPI plan phase, research artifacts, the /craft pipeline), so mostly distinct; minor overlap risk remains with generic planning/scaffolding skills since 'plan' is a broad trigger word.