Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable planning skill with clear sequencing and a properly disclosed single reference file. Its main weakness is moderate verbosity from conceptual and redundant sections that could be trimmed.
Suggestions
Cut or compress the "Context Compaction" and "Session Recovery" sections to one-line operational notes; the durable-state mechanics of beads are already implied by the workflow steps.
Prune "Anti-Patterns to Avoid" to items not already stated as positive requirements earlier (e.g. "Don't skip Agent Context blocks" restates the required-fields list).
Move the L3/L4 Good/Bad test-spec examples into references/template.md and keep only the boundary principle inline, reducing repeated explanatory framing.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient operational guidance, but sections like "Context Compaction", "Session Recovery", and "Anti-Patterns to Avoid" restate points already covered and explain conceptual framing Claude could infer, so it could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete executable steps (beads:epic, beads:dep, beads:label), an explicit phase ordering, required Agent Context fields, and a full decomposition example, with only minor gaps (no inline sample of a beads issue description body). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered Workflow (steps 1–5) with an approval/review checkpoint and per-phase verification gates; minor gaps only, and the planning output is non-destructive so no validation cap applies. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a well-sectioned overview that offloads the template, Agent Context reference, and beads issue templates to references/template.md (one level deep, signaled both inline and in a References section), with only minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |