Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill body is well-structured, actionable, and uses clean progressive disclosure with verified references and real validation checkpoints. Its main room for improvement is tightening verbose rule passages and making the end-to-end pipeline sequence more explicit.
Suggestions
Add a short numbered pipeline overview at the top (select candidates → design → build exports → verify → deliver) so the cross-section sequence is explicit rather than inferred.
Trim the repeated editorial cautions that reappear across the body and reference files to recover tokens without losing the rules.
Consolidate the chart-type selection guidance so the decision table and the surrounding prose do not restate the same forms.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body assumes Claude's intelligence (no generic explanations of charts or platforms) and stays instructional, though the dense prescriptive rule lists could be tightened in places. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance abounds for an instruction-only skill — hex palette codes, 1080×1350 default, "Slide 1 of N" naming, and an evidence-to-chart-type table — with only minor gaps in copy-paste-ready specifics. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sections sequence research → story → visual → build/review with explicit validation ("Verify actual values, axis ranges, units"; check PNG/PDF order) and ready/revise/hold feedback loops, but the overall pipeline is implicit rather than a numbered checklist. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview pointing via clearly signaled one-level-deep links to three real reference files (desk-edition-style, selection-and-performance, editorial-and-evidence), all verified present, with content appropriately split. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |