Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-structured workflow that gives concrete tool calls, decision rules, validation checkpoints, and a defined output format without teaching concepts Claude already knows. All four dimensions score at the top of the scale.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean bullet-and-section prose that assumes Claude's SEO competence; the only light glosses (e.g. 'one query splitting clicks across multiple URLs') earn their place as MCP-specific context, and there is no padding or concept teaching. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance throughout: named MCP tools with explicit parameters (dimensions: ["query","page"]), precise decision rules (same SERP intent groups together; different intent splits), and a fully specified output table plus per-cluster page brief structure. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 7-step workflow with explicit validation checkpoints — a get_serp_results overlap check for borderline terms, cannibalization confirmed from real Search Console data, and an ask-before-tagging gate — reinforced by a Guardrails section, satisfying the batch-operation validation requirement. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A self-contained single file with no bundle files needed, organized into clearly navigable sections (Goal, Required inputs, MCP tools, Workflow, Output format, Guardrails); content is appropriately kept inline rather than split into unnecessary references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |