Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, actionable instruction skill with concrete tooling, decision rules, and validation checkpoints, held just below the top anchors by minor repetition and the absence of explicit error-recovery loops.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — no padding about what SEO, keywords, or SERPs are — with only minor repetition of the Search Console/cannibalization point across Project context and Workflow, fitting the efficient-with-minor-trims anchor at 4 rather than the every-token-earns-its-place anchor at 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete MCP tool names are paired with specific parameters (e.g., get_search_console_performance with dimensions ["query","page"]), explicit decision rules (same SERP intent → together; different intent → split), and a defined output table, but it stops short of fully copy-paste-ready examples across every common case. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step sequence includes checkpoints (reuse research within 30 days, SERP overlap check for borderline terms, ask before tagging), and the batch tagging operation is gated by confirmation, satisfying the destructive/batch validation requirement; it lacks an explicit error-recovery feedback loop, keeping it below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the skill is self-contained with well-labeled sections (Goal, Required inputs, Project context, Tools, Workflow, Output format, Guardrails) and no nested references; it earns 4 rather than 5 because the body exceeds 50 lines with minor overlap between the tools list and the workflow steps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |