Conciseness

Lean and efficient throughout; every line is operational guidance with no padding or explanations of concepts Claude already knows, assuming Claude's competence.

Actionability

Fully executable guidance including a concrete routing table by finding type and copy-paste-ready validation commands ('jq empty .greptile/config.json .greptile/files.json', 'prettier --check', 'git diff --check') with specific file paths.

Workflow Clarity

Clear five-stage sequence (Verify -> Route -> Promote -> Edit -> Validate) with explicit validation checkpoints in section 5 and a feedback loop for ambiguous evidence ('leave the configuration and enforcement unchanged and report the candidate for human judgment').

Progressive Disclosure

Under 50 lines with no bundle files and well-organized section headers; per the rubric's simple-skill note this scores 5 with clean organization and no nested references.

Specificity

Lists several concrete actions ('Evaluate verified findings', 'promote durable review gaps into the version-controlled .greptile configuration', 'audit or update OpenSEO's Greptile rules') rather than vague language, but the niche domain leaves minor coverage gaps compared to a fully comprehensive list.

Completeness

Clearly answers both 'what' (evaluate findings and promote durable gaps into .greptile config) and 'when' with an explicit 'Use when...' clause listing three concrete trigger conditions.

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural trigger phrases ('Use when a review uncovers a recurring or high-risk repository invariant', 'when Greptile repeatedly produces a false positive', 'when asked to audit or update') with good keyword coverage, though some phrasing like 'repository invariant' leans technical rather than colloquial.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Targets a clear niche (Greptile configuration maintenance) with distinct triggers that would not naturally invoke other skills, minimizing conflict risk.