Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a tightly-scoped, highly actionable workflow with explicit checkpoints and validation feedback loops, and it is well-organized without relying on external bundle files. It assumes Claude's competence and provides concrete commands and taxonomies rather than abstraction.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — no explanations of git, pnpm, or CI basics — with every section earning its place, matching the score-3 lean-and-efficient anchor rather than the slight padding of a 2. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete commands and well-defined taxonomies throughout (git diff variants, pnpm ci:check, blocker/should-fix/nitpick severities, APPLY/APPLY-MODIFIED/REJECT verdicts, enumerated PR-description requirements) meet the score-3 fully-executable anchor rather than the incomplete guidance of a 2. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Numbered phases 0–5 with explicit 'Checkpoint' callouts and feedback loops ('Loop until ci:check passes and no verified findings remain unaddressed') match the score-3 clear-sequence-with-validation anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, so per the simple-skill scoring note the well-organized self-contained sections (0–5) and clearly-signaled by-name cross-skill pointers (maintain-greptile-rules, papercuts) meet the score-3 bar without external references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |