Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, highly actionable audit workflow with explicit validation and a review feedback loop; its main limits are minor verbosity and inlined output-format detail that could be split into a reference file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and directive — it does not explain what SEO, canonicals, or crawling are, and most sentences issue specific instruction rather than padding; a few passages (e.g. the repeated sizing rules) could be tightened, keeping it just under a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives concrete tool calls with parameters (e.g. `get_serp_results` with "Request depth 20", `resultTypes: ["organic"]`, `scope: "exact_url"`) and a copy-paste HTML skeleton, but several workflow steps remain judgment-driven rather than executable, so minor gaps hold it at 4. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced six-step workflow (Orient → Investigate → Shortlist → Choose → Size → Review) with explicit validation checkpoints ("Run the live checks now, not after drafting", re-run deciding queries before writing) and a reviewer feedback loop with a checklist, matching the anchor for explicit validation and error-recovery loops. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist; the single SKILL.md is organized into clearly labeled sections (Goal, Inputs, MCP tools, Workflow, Output format, Guardrails) with sibling-skill references signaled by name and no nested references, though the inlined HTML skeleton and detailed output format are content that could live in a separate reference file, keeping it at 4. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |