CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

simple-issue-description

Turn a rough bug report, feature request, support note, or pull request into a short, plain-language issue focused on the problem and desired behavior. Use when a contributor asks to simplify an issue, explain what a PR is for, create the corresponding issue for a PR, remove implementation detail from a report, or invokes /simple-issue-description.

71

Quality

86%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is well-structured, lean, and actionable with a clear workflow and copy-paste output template, though validation branches are scattered in prose rather than embedded as explicit inline checkpoints and the single example covers only one case. It is a strong instruction-only skill with only minor trimming and coverage gaps.

Suggestions

Add a second short example showing the "not issue-worthy" two-sentence reply so Claude has a concrete model for the cleanup/refactor case.

Fold the validation branches (clarifying question, no-concrete-problem override, private security report) into the numbered workflow as explicit labeled checkpoints rather than separate paragraphs.

Tighten the "Do not invent user impact" and security paragraphs to their core rules to recover a few tokens.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is efficient and free of generic concept explanations Claude already knows, but a few sentences (the long "Do not invent user impact" paragraph and the security note) could be tightened without losing guidance, so it sits just below the leanest anchor.

4 / 5

Actionability

It provides a concrete copy-paste output template, specific rules (under 200 words, lead with behavior, preserve evidence), and a worked example, but the example only demonstrates the bug happy path and does not illustrate the feature case or the "not issue-worthy" reply, leaving minor coverage gaps.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The six-step workflow is clearly sequenced with decision branches (ask a clarifying question, the "no concrete problem is clear" override that "wins over step 6," and the private-security-report checkpoint), but these validations live in supplementary paragraphs rather than inline checkpoints within the numbered sequence.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist and none are needed; the body is a self-contained instruction skill organized into clean, well-labeled sections (Workflow, Writing rules, Output format, Example) with no nested references, satisfying the simple-skill exception for well-organized content.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

95%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong: it states a concrete capability, provides explicit and natural trigger phrases covering the main use cases, and occupies a clear niche with low conflict risk. Minor room for improvement lies only in enumerating a slightly wider set of concrete actions.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names a concrete action ("Turn a rough bug report, feature request, support note, or pull request into a short, plain-language issue") and enumerates several specific sub-actions (simplify, explain what a PR is for, create a corresponding issue, remove implementation detail), giving broad coverage with only minor gaps.

4 / 5

Completeness

It clearly states what the skill does (turn rough inputs into a short plain-language issue) and explicitly when to use it with concrete trigger phrases, matching the anchor for answering both what and when.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

The "Use when..." clause lists highly natural phrasings a contributor would actually say ("simplify an issue," "explain what a PR is for," "create the corresponding issue for a PR," "remove implementation detail") plus the explicit slash-command trigger, giving comprehensive coverage of the domain's natural terms.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche (simplifying reports/PRs into plain-language issues, stripping implementation detail) is distinct and the triggers are specific enough to minimize overlap with generic issue-writing or summarization skills.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
every-app/open-seo
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.