Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplar of a focused debugging skill: lean, highly actionable with exact tool signatures, a clearly sequenced workflow with verification checkpoints and feedback loops, and well-organized into navigable sections without unnecessary splitting.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section (workflow, tool table, patterns, notes) earns its place, with only minor justified reinforcement of critical gotchas. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready tool calls with exact signatures and parameters (e.g., 'ecs_snapshot({ "label": "before" })', 'ecs_step(count, delta)') plus specific values (delta 0.016/0.0139) and component fields to inspect. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 10-step numbered sequence with explicit verification checkpoints (browser_screenshot at step 6, ecs_diff at step 8) and a feedback loop ('Repeat steps 5-8 until the behavior completes'), plus a Notes section documenting failure conditions. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single cohesive, well-organized file split into clear sections (Core Workflow, Tool Reference, Stepping Guidelines, Patterns, Notes) with no nested references; appropriate for a focused single-purpose debugging skill. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |