CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

cli-output-review

Review fallow's human-readable CLI output for scanability, information hierarchy, empty states, and terminal compatibility. Use when changes affect human output, command UX, or text formatting in the CLI.

71

Quality

86%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A lean, well-organized review skill that externalizes detail to clearly signaled reference files and defines an unambiguous verdict output. The body itself is thin on concrete review checks, relying on the referenced files for actionable methodology.

Suggestions

Add one or two concrete scanability/empty-state checks inline so the body is actionable even before opening the referenced files.

Include a brief validation checkpoint (e.g. "Confirm NO_COLOR rendering before issuing a verdict") to turn the terminal verdict into an explicit feedback step.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is extremely lean — "Read:" two files, "Review the concrete output path under crates/cli/", a short Focus list, and a verdict instruction — with no concept explanation or padding; every token earns its place, matching the anchor for lean, efficient content that assumes Claude's competence.

5 / 5

Actionability

It names concrete files (`.agents/agents/cli-output-reviewer.md`, `.agents/rules/cli-crate.md`), a concrete path (`crates/cli/`), specific focus areas, and an exact verdict vocabulary; the detailed review methodology lives in the referenced files, leaving minor gaps in the body itself, so it sits just below the fully copy-paste-ready anchor 5.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

There is a clear ordered sequence — read the two files, review the output path and snapshots, focus on the listed aspects, end with a verdict — with the verdict acting as a terminal checkpoint; no explicit validation checkpoint for review findings, so it falls below the explicit-validation anchor 5.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body is an overview that points one level deep to two clearly signaled files under a "Read:" list, with the substantive detail appropriately externalized; this matches the anchor for a clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references and easy navigation.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A tight, well-structured description that clearly conveys both purpose and trigger conditions with concrete facets. Minor room to broaden trigger synonyms and split the single review verb into more discrete actions.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Quotes "Review fallow's human-readable CLI output for scanability, information hierarchy, empty states, and terminal compatibility" — names the domain plus several concrete review facets, but rests on a single action verb rather than multiple distinct actions, so it sits just below the comprehensive anchor 5.

4 / 5

Completeness

It explicitly states what it does (review CLI output for four named facets) and when to use it ("Use when changes affect human output, command UX, or text formatting in the CLI"), matching the anchor that requires both what and when with concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

The clause "Use when changes affect human output, command UX, or text formatting in the CLI" supplies natural phrases a user would say, with good coverage; a few common synonyms (e.g. "console output") are missing, keeping it below anchor 5.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Scoped to "fallow's" CLI output with distinct triggers around human-readable output and terminal compatibility, giving it a clear niche with minimal overlap with other skills.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
fallow-rs/fallow
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.