Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplary lean, instruction-only skill: crisp sequencing, real decision rules, explicit validation, and zero token waste. The only notable gap is the absence of concrete commands for inspecting run logs, which is the central activity of the task.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every line carries instruction ("Classify the failure as flake, infra, or real before any action"; "Retry a suspected flake one time. A second identical failure is a defect"). No padding, no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Contains a concrete executable command ("git merge-base --is-ancestor origin/main HEAD"), a specific status URL, and crisp decision rules, but no example commands for the core log-inspection step (e.g. gh run view / gh run watch). Instruction-only guidance is otherwise actionable; matches "mostly executable with minor gaps". | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | An 8-step numbered sequence with explicit checkpoints: classify before acting, check githubstatus when many jobs fail, rebase instead of retry on a stale base, and "Re-run targeted validation and report residual risk" as a closing validation step. Not a destructive/batch operation, so no validation cap applies. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A 19-line single-file skill with no need for external references; per the rubric's simple-skill exception, well-organized sections suffice. The content is appropriately self-contained, and the one cross-skill pointer ("also use github-action-review") is clearly signaled. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |