Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable, well-sequenced with checklists and veto feedback loops, and cleanly organized with no external bundle dependencies. Its only weakness is conciseness, due to inline time-sensitive details that would be better isolated in a deprecated/old-patterns section.
Suggestions
Move time-sensitive specifics (the 'Caught 2026-04-30' anecdote and the hardcoded plugin-count regex '89|90|91|92|93') into a clearly labeled 'Old patterns / stale-count sweep' section so the stable guidance stays lean.
Consider an authoritative source for the current plugin count so the literal-number regex does not silently rot between releases.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean and assumes Claude's competence (no padding about JSON/serde), but time-sensitive details are inline rather than quarantined in a deprecated section — e.g. 'Caught 2026-04-30' and the literal plugin-count regex '89|90|91|92|93' — and the closed-enum checklist runs long. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready, executable guidance: concrete grep recipes, an exact bash plugin-count sweep, a real audit command, named key files with paths, and a defined verdict format — matching the score-3 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequenced structure with explicit checklists ('What to check', the audit Phase 3a checklist) and a feedback/veto loop (BLOCK rights) for schema-breaking changes, matching the score-3 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and none are needed; the body is self-contained and organized into well-labeled sections, so per the simple-skill scoring note a well-organized single file scores 3. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |