Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplary lean instruction-only workflow: an unambiguous 8-step sequence with explicit finding-filter criteria, a validation feedback loop, and concrete pointers to the repo's gate and routing documents. Its only limitation is that executable detail lives entirely in referenced repo documents.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean 8-step list plus a two-line closing note with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line ('trace the call site before you accept a bug claim', 'More than about five blocks usually means the filter is too weak') adds non-obvious guidance. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete file pointers ('docs/development/quality-gates.md', 'docs/development/review-routing.md'), explicit classification labels (APPROVE/CONCERN/BLOCK), and specific filtering criteria make the guidance mostly executable, but actual commands and gate selections are delegated to referenced documents rather than given inline. Not 3 because nothing is pseudocode or vague; not 5 because it is not self-contained executable guidance. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 1-8 sequence with explicit validation checkpoints and a feedback loop ('Fix every block, rerun the blocking reviewer, and update verification'), plus a checklist for filtering reviewer findings in step 6. Anti-drift check: score 4 requires minor validation gaps, but the fix-rerun loop and verification updates close the loop. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no need for external bundle files; the body is a well-organized flat numbered list whose references to repo docs are one level deep and clearly signaled by exact path, matching the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |