Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tightly written, well-structured workflow that provides concrete file paths and labels, an explicit fix-rerun feedback loop, and clean organization appropriate to its scope. It makes excellent use of the token budget.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean ~20-line numbered workflow with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, assuming competence throughout; every token earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Steps reference concrete file paths ('docs/development/quality-gates.md', 'docs/development/review-routing.md') and exact classification labels ('APPROVE', 'CONCERN', 'BLOCK'), giving specific, executable guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 7-step process with a classification checkpoint (step 6) and an explicit feedback loop in step 7 ('Fix every block, rerun the blocking reviewer, and update verification'), matching the level-3 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a simple skill under 50 lines with no external bundle references needed; the numbered list is well-organized, so per the rubric's simple_skills note progressive disclosure scores 3. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |