CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

ship

Land completed Fallow work after review, run pre-push parity, monitor merged-commit CI, and leave repositories clean. Use when asked to ship, merge, or move approved work to main.

75

Quality

92%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is an exceptionally lean, well-sequenced shipping checklist with explicit validation checkpoints and a completion gate. Its main weakness is actionability: it names what to verify but supplies no executable commands and defers the concrete checks to an external doc.

Suggestions

Inline one or two of the concrete pre-push checks or the merge/commit commands (or point to the specific quality-gates section) so the steps are directly executable without leaving the skill.

Add an explicit error-recovery loop after step 7, e.g. 'If conflict markers or generated drift are found, fix and re-inspect before declaring complete.'

Clarify what 'the required checks from docs/development/quality-gates.md' are at a high level so the skill remains actionable even if that doc is unavailable.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is an 8-line numbered checklist plus a one-line completion gate with zero padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, fitting the lean-and-efficient anchor where every token earns its place.

3 / 3

Actionability

The checklist gives concrete things to verify (companion commits, public contracts, generated files, signed conventional commits) but provides no executable commands and defers "the required checks" to an external doc, matching the anchor for concrete-but-incomplete guidance missing key details.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

A clearly sequenced 8-step process with explicit verification checkpoints (confirm scope match, verify pushes, inspect for conflict markers and drift) and a completion gate ("Do not call work complete while required merged-commit workflows are still running"), exceeding the anchor where checkpoints are merely implicit.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Under 50 lines with a single clearly signaled one-level reference ("docs/development/quality-gates.md") and no nested references, fitting the well-organized concise-skill anchor that permits a top score without external bundle files.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is concise, uses third-person imperative voice, and clearly separates capabilities from an explicit natural-language trigger. It names concrete actions and a distinct niche, with no over-claims or fluff.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — "Land completed Fallow work after review", "run pre-push parity", "monitor merged-commit CI", "leave repositories clean" — matching the anchor that lists several specific concrete actions rather than naming only a domain.

3 / 3

Completeness

It explicitly states both what it does (land reviewed work, run parity, monitor CI, leave clean) and when to use it via an explicit "Use when..." trigger, satisfying the anchor requiring clear answers to both what and when.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

The "Use when asked to ship, merge, or move approved work to main" clause supplies natural verbs a user would actually say (ship, merge, move to main), giving good coverage of common phrasings rather than just one keyword.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The post-review shipping-to-main niche with CI monitoring and clean-checkout restoration is a distinct workflow unlikely to trigger for unrelated skills, fitting the clear-niche-with-distinct-triggers anchor.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
fallow-rs/fallow
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.