Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-organized, concise instruction skill with clear decision criteria and concrete output formats. Its main gap is a fully worked example for the reusable-extraction case and the absence of feedback loops, though the latter is not strictly required here.
Suggestions
Add one fully filled-in reusable-extraction JSON example with a real (anonymized) skill name, slug, description, and a short content snippet so the output is copy-paste demonstrable.
Tighten the 'Example Extraction' section slightly; the prose narrative could be condensed into the concrete output format already shown.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and assumes Claude's competence without explaining basic concepts; only minor phrasing could be trimmed, fitting the 'efficient, minor over-explanation' anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete JSON output schemas and explicit decision criteria give mostly executable guidance, though the example output lacks a fully filled worked example for the reusable case. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequence (extract criteria, analysis steps, output format, guidelines) with decision gates is present; it is not a destructive/batch operation so no validation cap applies, though error-recovery feedback loops are absent. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single-file, well-sectioned instruction skill under ~70 lines with clear headers and no nested references qualifies for the simple-skill top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |