Content
96%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is lean, highly actionable, and well-organized with concrete examples and an explicit validation step. The only gap is progressive disclosure: all detail lives inline in one file with no links to deeper reference materials.
Suggestions
Move the per-language source-code link syntax table and/or the full test-spec/frontmatter detail into a separate reference file (e.g., references/syntax.md) and link to it from SKILL.md to improve progressive disclosure.
Add a short table of contents or 'Quick start' section at the top so readers can navigate directly to the section they need.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — it states rules and shows concrete markdown examples without explaining what markdown, architecture, or test specs are. Every section earns its place with no padding to trim. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready markdown snippets for good/bad section structure, wiki links, source-code links, @lat: code refs, test specs, and frontmatter, plus concrete numeric rules (e.g., first paragraph ≤250 chars). Specific examples cover the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | As a reference/authoring guide rather than a destructive multi-step operation, the simple-skill exception applies; the one explicit workflow — "Always run `lat check` after editing" with its validation checklist — is unambiguous and includes a validation checkpoint, so it clears the cap. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear section headers and cohesive inlined content, but it is a single ~170-line SKILL.md with no references to separate deeper files (no references/scripts/assets exist). Well-structured but no one-level-deep references for the longer detail sections, so it sits just below the top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |