Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-crafted, lean authoring guide with concrete examples, consistent validation emphasis, and clean organization. It avoids teaching known concepts and gives executable, copy-paste-ready guidance throughout.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and task-specific: it teaches only lat.md-specific rules (250-char leading paragraph, section IDs, wiki-link/code-ref syntax) without explaining markdown, YAML, or other concepts Claude already knows. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready markdown templates, concrete @lat: comment formats per language, frontmatter examples, and the executable `lat check` command — fully concrete rather than abstract. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The single editing action is unambiguous with an explicit validation checkpoint ("Always run `lat check` after editing") plus a Validation section enumerating what is checked, satisfying the simple-skill scoring note. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A self-contained authoring reference with no bundle files, no nested references, and well-organized sections (structure, IDs, links, refs, test specs, frontmatter, validation); content is appropriately in one file. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |