CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

schemathesis-api

Use when the task changes an HTTP API, an OpenAPI spec, or routes covered by contract tests. Run Schemathesis against the spec before calling the task done.

Quality

81%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

The canonical home for this skill is schemathesis-api in fazedordecodigo/python-api-validation-discovery

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A tight, well-structured body for a single-purpose skill: executable commands, explicit when-to-run and when-not rules, and a clearly signaled one-level-deep pointer to the source-of-truth doc. The only meaningful gap is the absence of failure-handling guidance after a failing Schemathesis run; conciseness is strong with only minor trimmable sentences.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and assumes competence: commands are given directly with no library tutorials or filler. A couple of motivational/rationale sentences ("O contrato precisa aguentar o que o spec permite", and the one-line summary of what the source doc explains) could still be trimmed, matching the anchor for efficient content with minor over-explanation rather than the every-token-earns-its-place anchor.

4 / 5

Actionability

Two fully executable commands are given ("apm run schemathesis --param spec=<caminho-ou-url-do-openapi>" and "python3 -m schemathesis run <caminho-ou-url-do-openapi>") plus explicit guidance to point at the real spec and not fabricate one. It falls short of anchor 5 because there is no guidance on interpreting or remediating a failing run (e.g., which checks to inspect, fixing divergence and re-running).

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

This is a simple single-purpose skill under 50 lines, and the single action is unambiguous: run Schemathesis against the platform API spec before closing the task, with explicit conditions for when it applies (route, schema, status, or OpenAPI changes) and when it does not block (Python-only changes). The Schemathesis run itself is the validation checkpoint, satisfying the simple-skill exception.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is under 50 lines, needs no external reference files (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ bundles exist), and is organized into clear sections (source of truth, what it complements, how to run). The single pointer to docs/schemathesis.md is clearly signaled and one level deep, matching the anchor for a well-organized short skill.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A concise, well-structured description with an explicit and specific "Use when" clause and a concrete action. Its main weakness is thinness of the "what": it says to run Schemathesis but not what that accomplishes, and trigger coverage misses common synonyms. It is clearly distinguishable from generic skills and free of fluff.

Suggestions

Extend the "what" with what the run actually does, e.g., "Runs Schemathesis to property-test the implementation against the OpenAPI contract and surface unexpected behavior".

Add natural trigger synonyms such as "REST API", "endpoint", or "swagger/OpenAPI file" to broaden keyword coverage.

Briefly state the outcome expectation (e.g., failing checks block task completion) so both what and when are fully explicit.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Run Schemathesis against the spec before calling the task done" is a single concrete action in a named domain (HTTP API / OpenAPI), matching the anchor for 1-2 concrete actions without comprehensive coverage. It does not list several distinct actions, so it falls below anchor 4.

3 / 5

Completeness

Both parts are explicit: the "when" ("Use when the task changes an HTTP API, an OpenAPI spec, or routes covered by contract tests") is concrete and specific, and the "what" ("Run Schemathesis against the spec before calling the task done") states a clear action. It stops short of anchor 5 because the "what" does not say what the check actually does (validate the implementation against the contract), only that the tool should be run.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural phrases a user would say are present: "changes an HTTP API", "an OpenAPI spec", "routes covered by contract tests". Common synonyms and variations (e.g., "REST endpoint", "swagger", ".yaml spec") are missing, which keeps it at good-but-not-comprehensive coverage (anchor 4).

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The triggers are anchored to a specific niche (OpenAPI specs, contract-tested routes), making it mostly distinct with only minor overlap risk against general API-testing or code-review skills. It is not a fully clear niche with minimal conflict, as any HTTP API change could plausibly also invoke generic testing skills.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

referenced_paths_exist

Referenced path issues: 1 missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

fazedordecodigo/python-api-validation-discovery

Path

.agents/skills/schemathesis-api/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.