Content
64%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a solid, actionable accessibility skill with excellent concrete examples (before/after HTML, CSS snippets, specific WCAG criteria) and a comprehensive checklist. Its main weaknesses are the lack of a clearly sequenced workflow with explicit validation checkpoints, some unnecessary framing content, and references to external files that aren't provided in the bundle. The checklist and anti-patterns sections are particularly strong and immediately useful.
Suggestions
Add an explicit numbered workflow sequence (e.g., '1. Run axe-core → 2. Fix critical/serious → 3. Keyboard walkthrough → 4. Screen reader check → 5. Zoom/reflow → 6. Document findings') with validation gates between steps.
Trim the opening paragraph and 'Quando Nao Usar' section — Claude doesn't need motivation about why accessibility matters or warnings about legal compliance scope; focus on the actionable content.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary framing (e.g., the opening paragraph explaining why accessibility matters, the 'Quando Nao Usar' section with caveats Claude doesn't need). The governance section references many external policies without adding actionable value. However, the checklists and code examples are tight. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable HTML/CSS code snippets with clear before/after patterns, a concrete WCAG checklist with specific criterion numbers, specific tool names (axe-core, NVDA, VoiceOver), and exact contrast ratios. The guidance is copy-paste ready and leaves no ambiguity about what to do. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 4-category testing table provides a clear methodology, and the checklist is well-structured. However, there's no explicit sequenced workflow with validation checkpoints — the skill doesn't define a clear order of operations (e.g., run automated first, then keyboard, then screen reader) with feedback loops for when issues are found. The 'Evidencia de Conclusao' section lists verification criteria but doesn't integrate them into a step-by-step process. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill references multiple external files (GLOBAL.md, various policies, templates/accessibility-check.md) but none are provided in the bundle, making it impossible to verify their existence or usefulness. The content itself is well-sectioned but somewhat long (~150 lines) with the full checklist inline rather than split into a reference file. For a skill this detailed, a separate checklist reference file would improve organization. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |